Subject: Re: [boost] Is there any interest in non-owning pointer-like types?
From: Jonathan Wakely (jwakely.boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-02-09 12:11:47
On 1 February 2017 at 22:30, Richard Hodges wrote:
> There is already an observer_ptr proposed for c++17.
No there isn't. The presence of something in a TS does not imply it
has been proposed for C++17 (or any later standard). Even if it had
been proposed, it's not part of the C++17 draft, which is supposed to
IIRC the only pieces of the Library Fundamentals TS v2 proposed for
C++17 were gcd and lcm, everything else that made it into C++17 had
been in Library Fundamentals TS v1 for some time and wasn't new in v2.
Most of the new stuff in v2 needs more time to bake.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk