Subject: Re: [boost] Review Request : Boost.SIMD
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-02-10 23:15:39
On 10 February 2017 at 10:18, TONGARI J via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Question: why not provide load/store as member functions (like
There is a similar library being worked on by people involved with the C++
standards committee, currently being reviewed by LEWG.
The interface for it is yet again different but the lack of consistency
with atomic was noted and will probably be addressed soon. I suggest
following those efforts and aligning with them.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk