Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [regression runner] Preference libstdc++ vs. libc++
From: Soul Studios (matt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-07 00:23:50

Next message: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] [regression runner] Preference libstdc++ vs. libc++"
Previous message: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] [preprocessing] Feedback requested on a C99 preprocessor written in pure universal Python"
In reply to: Edward Diener: "Re: [boost] [regression runner] Preference libstdc++ vs. libc++"
Next in thread: Jonathan Wakely: "Re: [boost] [regression runner] Preference libstdc++ vs. libc++"

> Do any Boost libraries really target gnu features, if they exist, that
> are not in the corresponding c++ level ?

There are compiler-specific macros for things like forced inlining. Not
sure if that's what you mean.

Next message: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] [regression runner] Preference libstdc++ vs. libc++"
Previous message: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] [preprocessing] Feedback requested on a C99 preprocessor written in pure universal Python"
In reply to: Edward Diener: "Re: [boost] [regression runner] Preference libstdc++ vs. libc++"
Next in thread: Jonathan Wakely: "Re: [boost] [regression runner] Preference libstdc++ vs. libc++"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk