Re: [boost] [regression runner] Preference libstdc++ vs. libc++

Subject: Re: [boost] [regression runner] Preference libstdc++ vs. libc++
From: Jonathan Wakely (jwakely.boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-07 13:14:25

On 6 March 2017 at 23:14, Edward Diener via Boost wrote:

>
> Do any Boost libraries really target gnu features, if they exist, that are
> not in the corresponding c++ level ? If not there is no reason to test the
> gnu levels and the c++ levels seem just fine. I know that I do not
> specifically test gnu levels but c++ levels instead when I run local tests.
>
>
Does Boost.Multiprecision depend on the __int128 and __float128 extensions?

std::is_integral<__int128>::value is true for gnu++14 but false for c++14