Subject: Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] Last three days
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-10 15:00:20
On 3/10/17 5:16 AM, John Maddock via Boost wrote:
> On 10/03/2017 08:24, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>> We have three last days remaining for safe_numerics review (till March
>> 11th). If you like working under time pressure, this is the perfect
>> for doing your review.
>> If you would like to submit your review, but feel you will not make it
>> March 11th, let me know, we can try to extend the review period.
> I'm going to try and write a review, but as well as being short on time,
> I'm hitting a lot of issues, most notably at present that almost all the
> tests include cxxabi.h which is a GCC libstdc++ internal header, is
> there a reason for this?
Hmm - I just looked into this. Most of them are superfluous. I built
and tested with CLang and GCC. I wasn't able to get appveyor to work to
test on VC. That's why I didn't pick this up sooner.
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk