Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] Last three days

Subject: Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] Last three days
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-10 15:00:20

On 3/10/17 5:16 AM, John Maddock via Boost wrote:
>
>
> On 10/03/2017 08:24, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>> We have three last days remaining for safe_numerics review (till March
>> 11th). If you like working under time pressure, this is the perfect
>> moment
>> for doing your review.
>>
>> If you would like to submit your review, but feel you will not make it
>> till
>> March 11th, let me know, we can try to extend the review period.
>
> I'm going to try and write a review, but as well as being short on time,
> I'm hitting a lot of issues, most notably at present that almost all the
> tests include cxxabi.h which is a GCC libstdc++ internal header, is
> there a reason for this?

Hmm - I just looked into this.  Most of them are superfluous.  I built 
and tested with CLang and GCC.  I wasn't able to get appveyor to work to 
test on VC.  That's why I didn't pick this up sooner.
>
> John.
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>