Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] Last three days

Subject: Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] Last three days
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-10 15:37:43

2017-03-10 16:00 GMT+01:00 Robert Ramey via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>:

> On 3/10/17 5:16 AM, John Maddock via Boost wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/03/2017 08:24, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>> We have three last days remaining for safe_numerics review (till March
>>> 11th). If you like working under time pressure, this is the perfect
>>> moment
>>> for doing your review.
>>>
>>> If you would like to submit your review, but feel you will not make it
>>> till
>>> March 11th, let me know, we can try to extend the review period.
>>>
>>
>> I'm going to try and write a review, but as well as being short on time,
>> I'm hitting a lot of issues, most notably at present that almost all the
>> tests include cxxabi.h which is a GCC libstdc++ internal header, is
>> there a reason for this?
>>
>
> Hmm - I just looked into this.  Most of them are superfluous.  I built and
> tested with CLang and GCC.  I wasn't able to get appveyor to work to test
> on VC.  That's why I didn't pick this up sooner.

Is it possible to apply a quick fix, to unblock John?

Regards,
&rzej;