Subject: Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] Formal review starts today
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-11 14:59:11
On 03/11/2017 07:27 AM, Paul A. Bristow via Boost wrote:
> John Maddock has since explained why nothing I tried worked. I'm a bit shocked that it hasn't been tested on MSVC. My acceptance
> was on the assumption that it would work. It really must be portable over recent GCC, Clang and MSVC at the very minimum.
> I suggest that we should pause the review until you adopt John's patches and reissue the review code and then restart the review.
> It'll be a bit poor to accept the library until a few people confirm it's working on MSVC.
VC2017 (which is the minimum required to build the library,
even with patches) wasn't released until halfway through
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk