Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [partly OT] Re: [review queue] What to do about the library review queue?
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-16 14:12:28

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [quickbook] diagnosing a missing [endsect]?"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [boost] Issue Tracker for Boost organization?"
In reply to: Paul A. Bristow: "Re: [boost] [partly OT] Re: [review queue] What to do about the library review queue?"
Next in thread: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [partly OT] Re: [review queue] What to do about the library review queue?"

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Paul A. Bristow via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> If projects are moving to use GitHub instead (or starting new projects using
> GitHub entirely)

If my library makes it into Boost I would vastly prefer to continue
using GitHub issues

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [quickbook] diagnosing a missing [endsect]?"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [boost] Issue Tracker for Boost organization?"
In reply to: Paul A. Bristow: "Re: [boost] [partly OT] Re: [review queue] What to do about the library review queue?"
Next in thread: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [partly OT] Re: [review queue] What to do about the library review queue?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk