Re: [boost] [partly OT] Re: [review queue] What to do about the library review queue?

Subject: Re: [boost] [partly OT] Re: [review queue] What to do about the library review queue?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-16 17:35:01

On 03/16/17 18:01, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Niall Douglas wrote:
>> On 16/03/2017 12:10, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Glen Fernandes via Boost
>> > <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> >> ...until we truly move to Github Issues
>> >
>> > What needs to be done in order to make this happen?
>>
>> A decision needs to be taken on how best to port the Trac issues into
>> github.
>
> This implies that we want to port the Trac issues into Github. This is
> not a requirement. The 'organic' way to migrate to new things is just to
> move on. Trac is legacy; leave it in read-only mode so that history is
> preserved, but there's no need to do anything else.

If we move to GitHub issues, I would rather have all open tickets moved 
from Trac there. Leaving them open in read-only Trac is not useful, and 
you can't request the reporters to duplicate the tickets on GitHub.

All open tickets should preferably be in one place.