Re: [boost] [partly OT] Re: [review queue] What to do about the library review queue?

Subject: Re: [boost] [partly OT] Re: [review queue] What to do about the library review queue?
From: Stefan Seefeld (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-16 18:01:24

On 16.03.2017 13:35, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:
> On 03/16/17 18:01, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
>> Niall Douglas wrote:
>>> On 16/03/2017 12:10, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Glen Fernandes via Boost
>>> > <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> >> ...until we truly move to Github Issues
>>> >
>>> > What needs to be done in order to make this happen?
>>>
>>> A decision needs to be taken on how best to port the Trac issues into
>>> github.
>>
>> This implies that we want to port the Trac issues into Github. This is
>> not a requirement. The 'organic' way to migrate to new things is just to
>> move on. Trac is legacy; leave it in read-only mode so that history is
>> preserved, but there's no need to do anything else.
>
> If we move to GitHub issues, I would rather have all open tickets
> moved from Trac there. Leaving them open in read-only Trac is not
> useful, and you can't request the reporters to duplicate the tickets
> on GitHub.
>
> All open tickets should preferably be in one place.

Why not let individual project / library maintainers decide how to
implement the move (or whether they want to move to github issues at all ?)

        Stefan

>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

-- 
      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...