Subject: Re: [boost] [review process] candidate library maintenance disturbs the review
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-17 12:04:20
2017-03-17 11:31 GMT+01:00 Olaf van der Spek via Boost <
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Also, I might consider submitting a review into BLIncubator, but what
> > chances I have that it will be considered in the formal review, given
> > the formal review may work on a different commit: possibly on a quite
> > different library by now?
> What about reporting (tracked) issues rather then doing a review?
For instance in GitHub. Yes, that works. But then I need the purpose of
BLIncubator to be re-explained to me. Is it a place that simply links to
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk