Re: [boost] [partly OT] Re: [review queue] What to do about the library review queue?

Subject: Re: [boost] [partly OT] Re: [review queue] What to do about the library review queue?
From: Stefan Seefeld (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-17 14:50:30

On 17.03.2017 10:40, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:
> On 03/17/17 16:13, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
>> Paul A. Bristow wrote:
>>
>>> So we must NOT just wipe the slate!
>>
>> All right, all right. If you like your slate, you will keep your slate.
>>
>> How about we just change our page
>>
>> http://www.boost.org/development/bugs.html
>>
>> to encourage people to submit pull requests (or, failing that, Github
>> issues) instead?
>
> I'm ok about recommending PRs but not issues. Bugs should be reported
> to the system chosen by the library maintainers. For some, it is still
> Trac.

I suggest each library gets its own home page (on
http://boostorg.github.io/
>, or somewhere else if that doesn't
exist yet), which contains some boilerplate (default) project info with
pointers to docs, issue tracker, and other project-specific info.
Library maintainers can then customize that page according to their own
needs.

(I'm already using that approach for http://boostorg.github.io/python/,
but this is obviously not yet advertised from Boost's main website.)

        Stefan

-- 
      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...