Subject: Re: [boost] [partly OT] Re: [review queue] What to do about the library review queue?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-17 15:04:38
On 03/17/17 17:50, Stefan Seefeld via Boost wrote:
> On 17.03.2017 10:40, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:
>> On 03/17/17 16:13, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
>>> Paul A. Bristow wrote:
>>>> So we must NOT just wipe the slate!
>>> All right, all right. If you like your slate, you will keep your slate.
>>> How about we just change our page
>>> to encourage people to submit pull requests (or, failing that, Github
>>> issues) instead?
>> I'm ok about recommending PRs but not issues. Bugs should be reported
>> to the system chosen by the library maintainers. For some, it is still
> I suggest each library gets its own home page (on
> exist yet), which contains some boilerplate (default) project info with
> pointers to docs, issue tracker, and other project-specific info.
> Library maintainers can then customize that page according to their own
> (I'm already using that approach for http://boostorg.github.io/python/,
> but this is obviously not yet advertised from Boost's main website.)
I've done that for my libraries, only I used README.md for that. For
It seems appropriate since that file is visible online and will get
checked out by default if the user clones git. It is also distributed in
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk