Subject: Re: [boost] About all these metaprogramming libraries
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-19 04:41:51
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Vladimir Batov via Boost <
> On 2017-03-19 12:02, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
>> Paul Fultz II wrote:
>> It would be nice to see better collaboration between authors to build an
>>> unifying metaprogramming library, rather than competing against each other.
>>> Of course, this can be somewhat difficult as they have different
>>> fundamental concepts.
>> As I see it, it's the fundamental concepts competing against each
>> other, and that's how it should be; how else we'll find out which
>> approach is best?
> Would not that be better to contain the battle among the gurus, the lib
> developers. So that they are forced to cooperate, to consider alternatives,
> to come up with one best (in their collective opinion) solution...
There is a big difference between "best" and "best in their collective
Also, one library may be best in one thing and suck at something else.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk