Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Attn: New Boost library policy text ready for approval (was: Re: [review queue] Proposed new policy to enter the review queue)
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-19 17:51:17


Niall Douglas wrote:

> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/boost-steering/rJPWdYodmtQ/JjaS-Kj4BgAJ
...
> The proposed reformed policy page for submitting a library for review to
> Boost can be found at
> https://boost-website.nedprod.com/development/submissions.html.

The first link asks for at least one endorser, the second asks for two.
Which one is correct?


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk