Subject: Re: [boost] About all these metaprogramming libraries
From: Michael Caisse (mcaisse-lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-19 22:00:20
On 3/19/17 12:31, Bruno Dutra via Boost wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Oswin Krause <
> Oswin.Krause_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 2017-03-19 17:13, Bruno Dutra via Boost wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 4:22 PM, degski via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
<snip features and criticisms of various libraries>
> You've pretty much described Metal, except that Metal requires lists to be
> specializations of metal::list, but that is far from a shortcoming, in fact
> there is a very good reason behind that design choice.
<snip more things why-I-designed-my-library-this-way>
Here is a suggestions. I don't think this thread is the place for the
authors to explain the benefits of their design/implementation/usage.
There will be a lot of time for that.
In this thread, we are trying (as a community) to figure out the best
approach to deal with multiple submissions of TMP libraries. Lets
concentrate on that concern.
Don't worry ... there will be plenty of opportunity for critique and
-- Michael Caisse Ciere Consulting ciere.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk