Re: [boost] [quickbook] diagnosing a missing [endsect]?

Subject: Re: [boost] [quickbook] diagnosing a missing [endsect]?
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-22 11:53:37

Daniel James wrote:
> On 22 March 2017 at 03:00, Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> 
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm more interested in our original topic, that is, there to be a way to 
> > validate a .qbk file such that (a) the warning for a missing [endsect] 
> > to be an error (and the same applies to other similar warnings, if there 
> > are any)
>
> I'm working on it:
>
> https://github.com/danieljames/quickbook/commit/68f11c3854b69173f321332f2cfa697314ea4712

Thanks!