Subject: Re: [boost] Boost MSM parallel behavior with delayed self-transitions?
From: Danylo Malyuta (danylo.malyuta_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-23 01:46:58
Thanks for the knowledge. It would be nice if you could give your opinion
on this question of mine regarding calling process_event from inside a
I'd like to know if what Takatoshi Kondo answered is really the only way to
achieve the result, or if maybe there is a cleaner and more straight
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Christophe Henry via Boost <
> Hi Danylo,
> >Hi Christophe,
> >Thanks for your input. I'm going to use std::thread for the parallel
> >functionality, I think.
> it will work with synchronization. For simple cases it's manageable.
> >How stable/complete is Asynchronous? Can I rely on
> >it, or would I still have a moderate chance of running into bugs?
> It's very stable and used intensively in production code (in the industry)
> since 2 years.
> You might find some bug of course, but no stability problem has been found
> since a long time.
> >PS. I love your documentation! What do you use for state machine diagrams
> Enterprise Architect.
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk