Re: [boost] Boost MSM parallel behavior with delayed self-transitions?

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost MSM parallel behavior with delayed self-transitions?
From: Danylo Malyuta (danylo.malyuta_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-23 01:46:58

Christophe,

Thanks for the knowledge. It would be nice if you could give your opinion
on this question of mine regarding calling process_event from inside a
thread:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/42941228/boost-msm-call-process-event-from-a-custom-function-not-an-action-inside-a-sta/42949021?noredirect=1#comment72995089_42949021

I'd like to know if what Takatoshi Kondo answered is really the only way to
achieve the result, or if maybe there is a cleaner and more straight
forward approach.

Best,

Danylo.

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Christophe Henry via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Hi Danylo,
>
> >Hi Christophe,
> >
> >Thanks for your input. I'm going to use std::thread for the parallel
> >functionality, I think.
>
> it will work with synchronization. For simple cases it's manageable.
>
> >How stable/complete is Asynchronous? Can I rely on
> >it, or would I still have a moderate chance of running into bugs?
>
> It's very stable and used intensively in production code (in the industry)
> since 2 years.
> You might find some bug of course, but no stability problem has been found
> since a long time.
>
> >
> >Best,
> >
> >Danylo.
> >
> >PS. I love your documentation! What do you use for state machine diagrams
> -
> >MagicDraw?
>
> Enterprise Architect.
>
>
> Regards,
> Christophe
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/
> mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>