Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [mailing list] No Reply-To in messages?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-26 23:58:21

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Andrey Semashev
<andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Niall Douglas via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Still, I've never had this problem with the previous infrastructure.
>>> Maybe the email clients tend to not send the second email to the From
>>> address when there is Reply-To. For example, the std-discussion and
>>> std-proposals mailing lists use this scheme:
>>> From: real original sender address
>>> To: mailing list address (e.g. "std-discussion_at_[hidden]"
>>> <std-discussion_at_[hidden]>)
>>> Reply-To: mailing list address (e.g. std-discussion_at_[hidden])
>>> No Cc headers.
>>> Can we use this scheme?
>> That was the previous scheme which caused the DMARC failure because
>> DMARC won't allow this ML to send email From: an address it does not own.
> Well, I'm not sure I understand the details, but I can see the
> problems with DMARC were resolved for lists at some point:
> And I can see that now the emails from those lists contain the
> original sender address in the From header. I'm not sure how exactly
> that was achieved, but I would like this list behave the same way.

Ping? I can see other people also having problems with the current
setup. Is there someone specific I should ask for help with this
matter? Any ticket/issue/request system?

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at