Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [mailing list] No Reply-To in messages?
From: Agustín Bergé (kaballo86_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-27 01:29:05

On 3/26/2017 8:58 PM, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Andrey Semashev
> <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Niall Douglas via Boost
>> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>> Still, I've never had this problem with the previous infrastructure.
>>>> Maybe the email clients tend to not send the second email to the From
>>>> address when there is Reply-To. For example, the std-discussion and
>>>> std-proposals mailing lists use this scheme:
>>>> From: real original sender address
>>>> To: mailing list address (e.g. "std-discussion_at_[hidden]"
>>>> <std-discussion_at_[hidden]>)
>>>> Reply-To: mailing list address (e.g. std-discussion_at_[hidden])
>>>> No Cc headers.
>>>> Can we use this scheme?
>>> That was the previous scheme which caused the DMARC failure because
>>> DMARC won't allow this ML to send email From: an address it does not own.
>> Well, I'm not sure I understand the details, but I can see the
>> problems with DMARC were resolved for lists at some point:
>> And I can see that now the emails from those lists contain the
>> original sender address in the From header. I'm not sure how exactly
>> that was achieved, but I would like this list behave the same way.
> Ping?

The mailing lists for std-discussion and std-proposals are not run by but by google groups. The ones affected by DMARC were the
WG21 lists.


Agustín K-ballo Bergé

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at