Subject: Re: [boost] [mailing list] No Reply-To in messages?
From: Agustín Bergé (kaballo86_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-27 01:29:05
On 3/26/2017 8:58 PM, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Andrey Semashev
> <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Niall Douglas via Boost
>> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>> Still, I've never had this problem with the previous infrastructure.
>>>> Maybe the email clients tend to not send the second email to the From
>>>> address when there is Reply-To. For example, the std-discussion and
>>>> std-proposals mailing lists use this scheme:
>>>> From: real original sender address
>>>> To: mailing list address (e.g. "std-discussion_at_[hidden]"
>>>> Reply-To: mailing list address (e.g. std-discussion_at_[hidden])
>>>> No Cc headers.
>>>> Can we use this scheme?
>>> That was the previous scheme which caused the DMARC failure because
>>> DMARC won't allow this ML to send email From: an address it does not own.
>> Well, I'm not sure I understand the details, but I can see the
>> problems with DMARC were resolved for isocpp.org lists at some point:
>> And I can see that now the emails from those lists contain the
>> original sender address in the From header. I'm not sure how exactly
>> that was achieved, but I would like this list behave the same way.
The mailing lists for std-discussion and std-proposals are not run by
isocpp.org but by google groups. The ones affected by DMARC were the
-- Agustín K-ballo Bergé http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk