Subject: Re: [boost] [mailing list] No Reply-To in messages?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-27 08:30:01
On 03/27/17 04:50, Michael Caisse via Boost wrote:
> On 3/26/17 16:58, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Andrey Semashev
>> <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Niall Douglas via Boost
>>> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>> Still, I've never had this problem with the previous infrastructure.
>>>>> Maybe the email clients tend to not send the second email to the From
>>>>> address when there is Reply-To. For example, the std-discussion and
>>>>> std-proposals mailing lists use this scheme:
>>>>> From: real original sender address
>>>>> To: mailing list address (e.g. "std-discussion_at_[hidden]"
>>>>> Reply-To: mailing list address (e.g. std-discussion_at_[hidden])
>>>>> No Cc headers.
>>>>> Can we use this scheme?
>>>> That was the previous scheme which caused the DMARC failure because
>>>> DMARC won't allow this ML to send email From: an address it does not own.
>>> Well, I'm not sure I understand the details, but I can see the
>>> problems with DMARC were resolved for isocpp.org lists at some point:
>>> And I can see that now the emails from those lists contain the
>>> original sender address in the From header. I'm not sure how exactly
>>> that was achieved, but I would like this list behave the same way.
>> Ping? I can see other people also having problems with the current
>> setup. Is there someone specific I should ask for help with this
>> matter? Any ticket/issue/request system?
> Are you referring to receiving two messages (one from the CC and one
> from the ML) with gmail unable to figure out what to make of it as the
Yes. At least, that's my understanding of the problem.
> What other problems are people having? I see other people had issues
> with their mail client setup.
I mean, people other than me are having the problem with two emails.
Ion's problem with the address book is also worth noting because I see
nothing wrong with having the list address in the address book. If the
real sender address was in the From header, this problem wouldn't have
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk