Re: [boost] [gsoc2017] Please review my proposal for project "Nearly antipodal points distance accuracy improvement. "

Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc2017] Please review my proposal for project "Nearly antipodal points distance accuracy improvement. "
From: Satyam Pandey (satyampandey0009_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-04-02 23:43:20

Hello Ruyong,
I just wanted to explain my part here. I did not copy as per what I
understand.I have tried answering your queries.I hope you will read it
calmly and would try to understand.

   1. As far as I could guess we share similar background of competitive
   programming and have no experience in contributing to any large orgs . So I
   used your proposal as reference for writing my proposal.
   2. Our Programming interest are same cause they are, I will end it here.
   This cannot be called a copy-case because thats-what I feel are the things
   that I like. How can you question that? Every guy that loves maths and
   programming would have written it in the same way and I'm not faking my
   interest toward them as  you can check by following the links that I have
   given about different contest that I have participated in. Or do you want
   to say no-one other than you can like both.
   3. The Timeline was, one feature that I liked in your proposal, so I
   used it. How its copying ? Your exact timeline will not even make sense for
   me,cause we are applying for different Projects.
   4. And I did not understood "And you did not code for programming
   competency test, but have the same idea of implement of test" . What
   does this mean ? . Firstly I haven't read your proposal after you start
   describing "*far enough*" . So ,I did not know what you were doing in
   your test. Even if I knew what you have done or written there, do you
   think, you have claimed that way of solving the problem by putting it in
   your proposal ? And even after reading your proficiency test idea, the
   only thing that matches with my idea is the Basic-Distance function which
   is the first result that we get after googling the problem ? So , have we
   both copied from google ??

And please before going public with this, you could have at-least talked to
me personally. I don't think Boost-Developer mailing list is meant for such
discussions. Mailing list are made for communication that concerns the
whole org not any individual. You could have directly mailed to me, before
creating this nuisance.
Genuinely you should be happy that people are following your style and if
not, at least think a little before calling someone cheat because borrowing
ideas are not equivalent to cheating , in anyway.

I apologize to all for spamming their mail-boxes

Thanks
Satyam Pandey

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Satyam Pandey <satyampandey0009_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> Hello Ruyong,
> I just wanted to explain my part here. I did not copy as per what I
> understand.I have tried answering your queries.I hope you will read it
> calmly and would try to understand.
>
>
>    1. As far as I could guess we share similar background of competitive
>    programming and have no experience in contributing to any large orgs . So I
>    used your proposal as reference for writing my proposal.
>    2. Our Programming interest are same cause they are, I will end it
>    here. This cannot be called a copy-case because thats-what I feel are the
>    things that I like. How can you question that? Every guy that loves maths
>    and programming would have written it in the same way and I'm not faking my
>    interest toward them as  you can check by following the links that I have
>    given about different contest that I have participated in. Or do you want
>    to say no-one other than you can like both.
>    3. The Timeline was, one feature that I liked in your proposal, so I
>    used it. How its copying ? Your exact timeline will not even make sense for
>    me,cause we are applying for different Projects.
>    4. And I did not understood "And you did not code for programming
>    competency test, but have the same idea of implement of test" . What
>    does this mean ? . Firstly I haven't read your proposal after you start
>    describing "*far enough*" . So ,I did not know what you were doing in
>    your test. Even if I knew what you have done or written there, do you
>    think, you have claimed that way of solving the problem by putting it in
>    your proposal ? And even after reading your proficiency test idea, the
>    only thing that matches with my idea is the Basic-Distance function which
>    is the first result that we get after googling the problem ? So , have we
>    both copied from google ??
>
>
> And please before going public with this, you could have at-least talked
> to me personally. I don't think Boost-Developer mailing list is meant for
> such discussions. Mailing list are made for communication that concerns the
> whole org not any individual. You could have directly mailed to me, before
> creating this nuisance.
> Genuinely you should be happy that people are following your style and if
> not, at least think a little before calling someone cheat because borrowing
> ideas are not equivalent to cheating , in anyway.
>
> I apologize to all for spamming their mail-boxes
>
> Thanks
> Satyam Pandey.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Ruoyun Jing <jingry0321_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Satyam,
>> Your proposal is same as me especially on milestone and programming test.
>> I received two emails from google docs. Sorry for my language is Chinese.
>> The meaning of this email is Satyam Pandey do a replace:replace “Dev
>> Environment Visual Studio for C# development Eclipse for JAVA development
>> Code Blocks, Sublime T…”  to“`+”
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Satyam Pandey (Google 文档) <
>> d+MTA0OTYzMTEyNjU1MDQ4ODM2NjY4-MTE2NjIwMzk2NDMwMjUwNDI3
>> MDcx_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> Satyam Pandey向“Proposal
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJbrW7k/edit?disco=AAAAA9C1YwA&usp=comment_email_document>
>>> â€æ·»åŠ äº†ä¸€æ¡å»ºè®®
>>> [image: Satyam Pandey]
>>> Satyam Pandey
>>>
>>> 替换：将“Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development Eclipse for JAVA
>>> development Code Blocks, Sublime T…”替换为“`+”
>>>
>>> 打开
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJbrW7k/edit?disco=AAAAA9C1YwA&usp=suggestion_email_discussion>
>>> Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
>>>
>>> æ‚¨æ”¶åˆ°æ­¤é‚®ä»¶æ˜¯å› ä¸ºæ‚¨è®¢é˜…äº†æœ‰å…³â€œProposal
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJbrW7k/edit?disco=AAAAA9C1YwA&usp=comment_email_document>
>>> ”的所有讨论。更改 Google 文档向您发送的内容。
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/docos/notify?id=1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJbrW7k&title=Proposal>
>>> 您可以通过回复此邮件来参与讨论。
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Northwest University of China
>> Software Engineering
>> jingry0321_at_[hidden] <jingry0321_at_[hidden]>
>>
>> The meaning of this email is Satyam Pandey reject the comment of
>> "Proposal" from his own, replace “Dev Environment Visual Studio for C#
>> development Eclipse for JAVA development Code Blocks, Sublime T…”  to“`+”
>> 2017-04-02 21:03 GMT+08:00 Satyam Pandey (Google 文档) <
>> d+MTA0OTYzMTEyNjU1MDQ4ODM2NjY4-MTE2NjIwMzk2NDMwMjUwNDI3
>> MDcx_at_[hidden]>:
>>
>>> Satyam Pandey拒绝了“Proposal
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJbrW7k/edit?disco=AAAAA9C1YwA&usp=comment_email_document>
>>> ”中的建议
>>> [image: Satyam Pandey]
>>> Satyam Pandey
>>>
>>> 替换：将“Dev Environment Visual Studio for C# development Eclipse for JAVA
>>> development Code Blocks, Sublime T…”替换为“`+”
>>>
>>> [image: Satyam Pandey]
>>> Satyam Pandey
>>>
>>> *已拒绝建议*
>>> 打开
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJbrW7k/edit?disco=AAAAA9C1YwA&usp=suggestion_email_discussion>
>>> Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
>>>
>>> æ‚¨æ”¶åˆ°æ­¤é‚®ä»¶æ˜¯å› ä¸ºæ‚¨è®¢é˜…äº†æœ‰å…³â€œProposal
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJbrW7k/edit?disco=AAAAA9C1YwA&usp=comment_email_document>
>>> ”的所有讨论。更改 Google 文档向您发送的内容。
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/docos/notify?id=1wj9xPSmdehh9MzE-3MGHMu7cwMhDPASUEvU9pJbrW7k&title=Proposal>
>>> 您可以通过回复此邮件来参与讨论。
>>>
>>
>> I think I need you to give some explanation.
>>
>> --
>> Northwest University of China
>> Software Engineering
>> jingry0321_at_[hidden] <jingry0321_at_[hidden]>
>>
>
>