Re: [boost] [simd] Hardware support

Subject: Re: [boost] [simd] Hardware support
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-04-08 14:40:38

Sorry if this has been answered already but what is the incentive to
evolve the Boost version instead of the commercial version (or both)?
Boost libraries seem like they can be quite labor intensive to
maintain, especially libraries targeting specific architectures; is
there not a clear conflict of interest with respect to development
time being split across a for-pay and a for-free version of the same
library?