Re: [boost] [config] What to call macros to indicate deprecated/removed components

Subject: Re: [boost] [config] What to call macros to indicate deprecated/removed components
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-04-16 12:09:56

Daniel James wrote:

> No strong opinion, but do we want the default to be that they're 
> available?

This is a good point in principle, but as things are added and then removed, 
the correct default for, say, <codecvt>, flips from not available (in C++03) 
to available (in C++11) to again not available (in C++20).