Re: [boost] [outcome] Ternary logic -- need an example

Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] Ternary logic -- need an example
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-20 15:19:31

On 05/20/2017 04:17 PM, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:

> I hope readers are convinced that HTTP requests and responses should
> be modeled as self-contained objects with all necessary fields
> prescribed by rfc7230, and that the HTTP status should be neither
> separate nor stored in an error_code.

Not really, but that is the subject for a review of a different library.