Re: [boost] Request for endorsements for mp11

Subject: Re: [boost] Request for endorsements for mp11
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-22 14:08:48

On 5/22/17 4:43 AM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Would anyone be so kind as to formally endorse mp11 as a candidate for
> Boost?
>
> As a reminder, mp11 is a simple C++11 metaprogramming library, available at
>
>    https://github.com/pdimov/mp11/
>
> CSS-less documentation can be viewed at
>
>    https://rawgit.com/pdimov/mp11/master/doc/html/mp11.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>

I read this some time ago - and think it's great.  At the same time 
there is at least one other proposal which overlaps.  And then there is 
Hana. And truth is, I can't understand all the comparative 
advantages/disadvantages of the various proposals.  I would hope that we 
find a way to discuss them as a set rather than being required to 
approve/disapprove one a time.  This latter would mean that the 
selection of the "best" proposal would be affected by the order of 
evaluation - not a good thing.  I realize that there is a big risk that 
this could/would likely turn into a rhetorical fiasco which would leave 
us worse off, but still ...