Subject: Re: [boost] Request for endorsements for mp11
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-22 14:56:28
Robert Ramey wrote:
> And then there is Hana.
There'll always be Hana, I suppose.
mp11 is not quite a competitor to Hana. True, they both do metaprogramming.
But mp11 is rather a replacement for the myriads of hand-rolled type-based
metaprogramming primitives scattered all over people's code; it's like a
collection of these same primitives, but done coherently and with an unified
naming convention. (And with, I suppose, proper-ish documentation and a test
It pains me each time I see the same mp_wheel being reinvented, and each
time the standard library acquires an ad-hoc, arbitrarily named,
metaprogramming primitive. This has to end.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk