Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Review of PolyCollection starts today (May 3rd)
From: Gavin Lambert (gavinl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-23 01:51:48
On 23/05/2017 05:21, Joaquin M López Muñoz wrote:
>> This word sounds a bit awkward to me.
> Any less awkward synonim? For other readers' convenience, the statement in
> which the word appears is:
> "This mechanism is rendered mostly useless when derived1, derived2 and
> derived3 elements are traversed interspersedly without a definite pattern."
>> "to explicitly forbid"
>> split infinitive
> At the risk of starting a style war, it is my understanding that split
> infinitives are okay when used wth caution. Here, the alternative:
> "to forbid explicitly copying at"
> seems (to me) less clear as it might be parsed as referring to some sort of
> explicit copying...
FWIW, as a native English (or dialect thereof) speaker, the original
version sounds better to me, and not just because of the ambiguity of
the alternative. As far as I am aware, objecting to split infinitives
is out of fashion, and was never all that popular to begin with.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk