Re: [boost] [outcome] Possible extensions/changes to std::experimental::expected

Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] Possible extensions/changes to std::experimental::expected
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-25 15:01:25

Niall Douglas wrote:

> I don't pretend we don't need them. I say that people who store Expected 
> in an associative map need their head examined. And if they really, really 
> want to, they can supply a custom comparison function to the map. We don't 
> need default ordering operators if it means losing implicit conversion and 
> creating yet more needless boilerplate for end users.

+1