Subject: Re: [boost] [config] C++17 macros wanted
From: Tal Lancaster (tal.lancaster_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-26 19:59:15
> On May 26, 2017, at 2:32 PM, Glen Fernandes via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Friday, May 26, 2017, Tal Lancaster wrote:
>> I have been adding C++17 features to date_time. There are two config
>> macros, I would like to have:
>> Test for C++17âs constexpr inline feature. Maybe call it something like:
>> Test for C++17âs structured binding feature. Maybe call it something
>> like: BOOST_NO_CXX17_STRUCT_BIND
> How soon do you need these available?
> (BOOST_NO_CXX17_STRUCTURED_BINDINGS and
> BOOST_NO_CXX17_INLINE_VARABLES seem better to me).
I was picking names that described the officialI usage. I am fine with the name alternate if others feel that it is clearer. Iâm not particularly tied to the name.
As to the timing. I have started using them in my code changes but I am planning on holding off on any pull requests until something more official is in place.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk