Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] user's experience
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-26 23:57:44
> What do you think. Am I using the library correctly?
It looks okay. Not perhaps as idiomatic as a ground up redesign, but
your retrofit should allow more comparative benchmarking.
The static assert looking for E in expected<T, E> to have a nothrow copy
constructor was excessively strict due to a then lack of never empty
guarantee. It has been fixed since in develop branch.
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk