Re: [boost] [outcome] user's experience

Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] user's experience
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-27 12:50:05

2017-05-27 1:57 GMT+02:00 Niall Douglas via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>:

> > What do you think. Am I using the library correctly?
>
> It looks okay. Not perhaps as idiomatic as a ground up redesign, but
> your retrofit should allow more comparative benchmarking.
>

What would a "ground up redesign" be? Can you give me any hint?

> The static assert looking for E in expected<T, E> to have a nothrow copy
> constructor was excessively strict due to a then lack of never empty
> guarantee. It has been fixed since in develop branch.
>

Cool.

Regards,
&rzej;