Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] user's experience
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-27 12:50:05
2017-05-27 1:57 GMT+02:00 Niall Douglas via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>:
> > What do you think. Am I using the library correctly?
> It looks okay. Not perhaps as idiomatic as a ground up redesign, but
> your retrofit should allow more comparative benchmarking.
What would a "ground up redesign" be? Can you give me any hint?
> The static assert looking for E in expected<T, E> to have a nothrow copy
> constructor was excessively strict due to a then lack of never empty
> guarantee. It has been fixed since in develop branch.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk