Re: [boost] [outcome] Review of Outcome

Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] Review of Outcome
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-29 22:52:52

> I think I favor option 1 from those two. It probably would be even nicer
> if you could make boostorg/outcome as described in (1) the primary and
> git submodule it into the standalone ned14/outcome, but (1) looks good
> enough.

Thanks for that feedback.

Not to chance my arm too much, but would you be willing to change your
vote to yes conditional on form 1 and a second review to check that it
is so?

Niall

-- 
ned Productions Limited Consulting
http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/