Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] Review of Outcome
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-30 01:36:05
Niall Douglas wrote:
> > I think I favor option 1 from those two. It probably would be even nicer
> > if you could make boostorg/outcome as described in (1) the primary and
> > git submodule it into the standalone ned14/outcome, but (1) looks good
> > enough.
> Thanks for that feedback.
> Not to chance my arm too much, but would you be willing to change your
> vote to yes conditional on form 1 and a second review to check that it is
I suppose so, but as the design seems to be evolving as well, a proper
second review will be in order and I can't promise you a YES vote there
(which is what YES conditional basically means).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk