Re: [boost] [cmake] Minimum viable cmakeification for Boost

Subject: Re: [boost] [cmake] Minimum viable cmakeification for Boost
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-21 15:53:57

Niall Douglas wrote:
> But I suspect this is cart before horse, mountain out of molehill stuff.
> I think 98% of end users are wholly doing one of these three use cases:
>
> 1. All shared Boost libraries.
>
> 2. All static Boost libraries.
>
> 3. Precompiled headers/Header only Boost libraries.

Even if so, you still need to be able to answer the question "how do I link 
to Asio in such a way so that its dependency System is 
statically/dynamically linked?"