Re: [boost] [cmake] Minimum viable cmakeification for Boost

Subject: Re: [boost] [cmake] Minimum viable cmakeification for Boost
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-21 17:44:18

On 21/06/2017 16:53, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Niall Douglas wrote:
>> But I suspect this is cart before horse, mountain out of molehill stuff.
>> I think 98% of end users are wholly doing one of these three use cases:
>>
>> 1. All shared Boost libraries.
>>
>> 2. All static Boost libraries.
>>
>> 3. Precompiled headers/Header only Boost libraries.
> 
> Even if so, you still need to be able to answer the question "how do I
> link to Asio in such a way so that its dependency System is
> statically/dynamically linked?"

I'm saying that ASIO header only users almost certainly will also want
header only Boost.System.

Niall

-- 
ned Productions Limited Consulting
http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/