Re: [boost] [cmake] Minimum viable cmakeification for Boost

Subject: Re: [boost] [cmake] Minimum viable cmakeification for Boost
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-21 17:50:02

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Niall Douglas via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I'm saying that ASIO header only users almost certainly will also want
> header only Boost.System.

I second that. I would venture a guess that the collective man-hours
wasted by Boost.Asio users wrestling with their build scripts to also
link in Boost.System greatly outweighs the time it would take for one
person to make Boost.System header-only.