Re: [boost] [cmake] Minimum viable cmakeification for Boost

Subject: Re: [boost] [cmake] Minimum viable cmakeification for Boost
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-23 09:16:45

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Peter Dimov via Boost
> Sent: 22 June 2017 17:42
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Cc: Peter Dimov
> Subject: Re: [boost] [cmake] Minimum viable cmakeification for Boost
> 
> Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> > OK - I confess - made that up ;-)
> >
> > oligo - few
> >
> > neuronic - neurons
> >
> > (with the benefit of dimly remembered Latin - I was extruded forcibly
> > though O level by my Mother who had a Classics degree - oligarchy - rule
> > by a few people, and chemistry - oligomers - polymers with a few mers)
> 
> cf. oligophrenia

Clearly applicable to me - as I'm told that I can't tell me Greek from my Latin ;-)

Paul