Re: [boost] [cmake] Minimum viable cmakeification for Boost

Subject: Re: [boost] [cmake] Minimum viable cmakeification for Boost
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-22 16:41:51

Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> OK - I confess - made that up ;-)
>
> oligo - few
>
> neuronic - neurons
>
> (with the benefit of dimly remembered Latin - I was extruded forcibly 
> though O level by my Mother who had a Classics degree - oligarchy - rule 
> by a few people, and chemistry - oligomers - polymers with a few mers)

cf. oligophrenia