Subject: Re: [boost] [review][beast] Review of Beast starts today : July 1 - July 10
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-05 16:32:33
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Robert Ramey via Boost
> When one puts his library "out there"
> the hope is that people will use it and he will get feed back from users,
> bug fixes etc. But to make the library easy to use within boost is to make
> it hard to use outside of boost. A library should "just work" whether or not
> the user has boost installed or not. or whether he is running as a
> subdirectory of boost or not. Or whether he uses b2 or not.
Yes that was my thinking as well when I set it up. However, Peter's
suggestion to add:
: requirements <implicit-dependency>/boost//headers
Seems to work. Or rather, it didn't break anything. So the problem you
allude to might be easily fixed by just having a better "best
practices" document. Maybe there could be a "blank" repository under
boostorg/ that implements a "Hello world!" function in a header file
and is organized exactly like a boost library with tests, b2/cmake,
Travis, Appveyor, CircleCI integration, documentation, and works in or
out of tree.
Someone could just clone this blank project and then they are good to go.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk