Subject: Re: [boost] [beast] Formal review
From: Seth (bugs_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-10 11:14:55
On 10-07-17 00:13, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
> it is a feature unlikely to see significant use in the near term.
I don't think this is how Boost design review can be driven.
You get 1 chance to do the right thing, or you cripple the library
either due to legacy stuff or due to continually breaking changes.
> That is not to say that I won't address it in the future.
The library is being reviewed as-is. That is the intent, and has been
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk