Subject: Re: [boost] Encoding address-model in library names
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-11 03:18:30
On 07/10/2017 08:39 PM, Tom Kent via Boost wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]
>> I have prepared the pull requests necessary to encode the address-model
>> (32 or 64) in the library names, which allows placing the 32/64 libraries
>> into the same stage/install directory, and building with
>> address-model=32,64 in one go.
> What happens if the user leaves off the address-model parameter entirely? I
> seem to recall that in bjam configs the absence of address-model is
> different from address-model=32, will that cause different file names?
That used to be the case, but address-model is
now auto-detected by Jamroot.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk