Subject: Re: [boost] Encoding address-model in library names
From: Tom Kent (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-11 02:39:25
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]
> I have prepared the pull requests necessary to encode the address-model
> (32 or 64) in the library names, which allows placing the 32/64 libraries
> into the same stage/install directory, and building with
> address-model=32,64 in one go.
What happens if the user leaves off the address-model parameter entirely? I
seem to recall that in bjam configs the absence of address-model is
different from address-model=32, will that cause different file names?