Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Formal review of Mp11

Subject: Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Formal review of Mp11
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-15 12:36:20

On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 3:19 AM, Bjorn Reese via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The formal review of Peter Dimov's Mp11 library is scheduled for
> July 15 - July 24, 2017 [1].

* The documentation states: "mp_if_c<true, T, E…> is an alias for T.
mp_if_c<false, T, E> is an alias for E. Otherwise, the result is a
substitution failure."

Should that read "mp_if_c<false, T, E...>"? If not, why? And shouldn't
the document address it?