Subject: Re: [boost] Switch to CMake -- Analysis
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-21 15:18:47
On 07/21/17 18:00, Thomas Heller via Boost wrote:
> Am 21.07.2017 4:55 nachm. schrieb "paul" <pfultz2_at_[hidden]>:
> On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 16:21 +0200, Thomas Heller via Boost wrote:
>> All in all, I am pretty confident that a disruptive switch will hurt
>> Boost more than it brings benefit. This already happened. To come to an
>> end and summarize: Provide proper CMake integration, such that Boost is
>> consumable by those (while you are at it, don't forget meson, bazel and
> pkg-config is build-indenpendent so can be consumed by meson and bazel.
> It's also consumable by cmake. Doesn't propagate build properties though.
> Only plain and simple strings on how to invoke the compiler/linker.
> Anything else is not the default behavior.
It does, at least with regard to macros to define, include/library
directories to add and libraries to link with. Or do you have different
properties in mind?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk