Subject: Re: [boost] Switch to CMake -- Analysis
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-21 16:19:03
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Stefan Seefeld via Boost
> You are talking about a use-case involving a Boost *binary* package. How
> is this related to how Boost is built, i.e. how such binaries are
> produced ?
It is not related to building Boost but it solves something that
annoys a non-zero percentage of Boost users who use CMake. Its not
"moving the build system to cmake" but its step forward.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk