Subject: Re: [boost] Switch to CMake -- Analysis
From: Stefan Seefeld (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-21 16:34:48
On 21.07.2017 12:19, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Stefan Seefeld via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> You are talking about a use-case involving a Boost *binary* package. How
>> is this related to how Boost is built, i.e. how such binaries are
>> produced ?
> It is not related to building Boost but it solves something that
> annoys a non-zero percentage of Boost users who use CMake.
Then *please* let's not add unrelated points to the discussion, for the
sake of getting a handle of what problems we have to solve, and how.
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk