Subject: Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Formal review of Mp11
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-22 19:10:54
> > 1. Should Mp11 be accepted into Boost? Please state all conditions
> > for acceptance explicity.
> Yes. Especially so if mp11 can be merged with the ideas from kvasir and
> > 3. What is your evaluation of the implementation?
> It is solid. I would like to see some improvement in the sort algorithm,
What specifically? It holds its own pretty well on metaben.ch, on Clang 4 it
loses only to kvasir (but then again, who doesn't lose to kvasir?)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk