Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Formal review of Mp11
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-22 19:10:54

peterkochlarsen wriote:
> > 1. Should Mp11 be accepted into Boost? Please state all conditions
> > for acceptance explicity.
> Yes. Especially so if mp11 can be merged with the ideas from kvasir and
> brigand.


> > 3. What is your evaluation of the implementation?
> It is solid. I would like to see some improvement in the sort algorithm,
> however.

What specifically? It holds its own pretty well on, on Clang 4 it
loses only to kvasir (but then again, who doesn't lose to kvasir?)

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at