Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Formal review of Mp11

Subject: Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Formal review of Mp11
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-22 19:10:54

peterkochlarsen wriote:
> >   1. Should Mp11 be accepted into Boost? Please state all conditions 
> > for acceptance explicity.
>
> Yes. Especially so if mp11 can be merged with the ideas from kvasir and 
> brigand.

Thanks.

> >   3. What is your evaluation of the implementation?
>
> It is solid. I would like to see some improvement in the sort algorithm, 
> however.

What specifically? It holds its own pretty well on metaben.ch, on Clang 4 it 
loses only to kvasir (but then again, who doesn't lose to kvasir?)