Subject: Re: [boost] Dependency report
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-28 07:56:22
Gavin Lambert wrote:
> While this arrangement sort of makes sense for the purposes of cleaning a
> dependency graph, doesn't this just proliferate the problem of header
> files in the "wrong" directory for its library?
At some point we should probably add deprecation warnings to the
wrongly-owned headers, to enable their removal further down the line.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk