Subject: Re: [boost] Dependency report
From: Michel Morin (mimomorin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-29 11:45:52
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Gavin Lambert wrote:
>> While this arrangement sort of makes sense for the purposes of cleaning a
>> dependency graph, doesn't this just proliferate the problem of header files
>> in the "wrong" directory for its library?
> At some point we should probably add deprecation warnings to the
> wrongly-owned headers, to enable their removal further down the line.
We can add the following to the forwarding headers _now_
so as not to forget to deprecate them ;)
// This file will be removed in Boost 1.73
#if BOOST_VERSION >= 107000
# error "This file shouldn't be used. Please use <boost/newlib/xxxx.hpp>."
#elif BOOST_VERSION >= 106700 \
# warning "This file is deprecated. Please use <boost/newlib/xxxx.hpp>."
(#warning part should be made portable.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk